Immigrants from Uganda vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Chickasaw
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,313,137 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.142% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 1,142.1 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,584 compared to $82,193, a difference of 26.0%), median household income ($87,553 compared to $70,005, a difference of 25.1%), and median family income ($106,188 compared to $85,356, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 9.0%), householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $53,732, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $44,763, a difference of 17.0%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,043 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,188 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,553 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,041 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,064 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,739 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,374 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,698 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,584 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,976 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 24.9% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 29.4%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 29.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 10.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.93%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Excellent 7.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.5% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.2% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.0% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 21.0%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 19.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.73%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (62.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 62.7% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.23 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 25.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.0% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 50.0%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 46.6%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.53%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Fair 96.0% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Average 94.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.5% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.9% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.7% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 56.3%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 52.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.9%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |