Italian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Italian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Italians
Chickasaw
8,365
SOCIAL INDEX
81.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
74th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Italian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,111 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Italian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Italians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Italians corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Chickasaw.
Italian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Italian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,224 compared to $82,193, a difference of 34.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,215 compared to $77,929, a difference of 33.7%), and median household income ($92,475 compared to $70,005, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income over 65 years ($63,885 compared to $53,732, a difference of 18.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,426 compared to $44,763, a difference of 19.4%).
Income Metric | Italian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,574 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,372 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $92,475 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,915 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,551 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,505 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,426 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,215 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $110,224 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,885 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.1% | Tragic 27.2% |
Italian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Italian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 46.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 8.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.9%).
Poverty Metric | Italian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Italian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Italian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Italian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.8% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
Italian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Italian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Italian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.6% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.1% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 79.0% |
Italian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Italian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.2%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.66%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Italian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.8% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.0% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.12 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.8% | Tragic 36.3% |
Italian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Italian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.7%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.060%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Italian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.4% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.6% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Italian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Italian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 43.3%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 41.7%), and bachelor's degree (40.1% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
Education Level Metric | Italian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.5% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.2% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.2% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 61.1% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.1% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 2.0% | Tragic 1.5% |
Italian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Italian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 50.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 43.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age over 75 (45.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.7%).
Disability Metric | Italian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.6% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |