Aleut vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Aleut
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Aleuts
Chickasaw
3,609
SOCIAL INDEX
33.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
216th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Aleut Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,985,519 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Aleut communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Aleuts within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Aleuts corresponds to an increase of 29.3 Chickasaw.
Aleut vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,052 compared to $82,193, a difference of 21.7%), median household income ($83,446 compared to $70,005, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,370 compared to $77,929, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,168 compared to $47,832, a difference of 7.0%), median earnings ($44,241 compared to $40,672, a difference of 8.8%), and median female earnings ($38,719 compared to $34,414, a difference of 12.5%).
Income Metric | Aleut | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,210 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Poor $98,702 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,446 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,241 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,168 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,719 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,377 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,370 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $100,052 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,708 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Aleut vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.4%), female poverty (13.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 18.8%), and poverty (12.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%), single female poverty (25.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.1%).
Poverty Metric | Aleut | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Fair 12.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Poor 9.5% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Poor 11.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.3% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.4% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Poor 12.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
Aleut vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 56.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 43.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.71%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Aleut | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.8% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 9.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.4% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.4% | Good 5.4% |
Aleut vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Aleut | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.2% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 79.0% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.4% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Aleut vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 13.5%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.6%), and births to unmarried women (39.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.15%), married-couple households (45.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Aleut | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 39.3% | Tragic 36.3% |
Aleut vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 65.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 5.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 9.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Aleut | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.5% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Aleut vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 7.8%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and college, 1 year or more (55.4% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.13%), 5th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.22%).
Education Level Metric | Aleut | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.4% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.2% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.3% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Aleut vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 48.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and hearing disability (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.6%).
Disability Metric | Aleut | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.6% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.3% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.9% |