Luxembourger vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,531,931 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.867. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.136% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 136.0 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $82,193, a difference of 26.0%), per capita income ($45,663 compared to $36,475, a difference of 25.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $77,929, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.98%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $44,763, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $53,732, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 50.2%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 49.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.8%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 35.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.9%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.7%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 25.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 46.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.11%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 37.3%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 34.4%), and bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 64.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 52.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.9%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.8%).