Cambodian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cambodian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cambodians
Chickasaw
9,346
SOCIAL INDEX
90.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
19th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Cambodian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,724,038 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Cambodian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.540. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cambodians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.188% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cambodians corresponds to an increase of 188.4 Chickasaw.
Cambodian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,731 compared to $36,475, a difference of 41.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,342 compared to $82,193, a difference of 39.1%), and median family income ($117,780 compared to $85,356, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($55,571 compared to $44,763, a difference of 24.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,892 compared to $53,732, a difference of 24.5%).
Income Metric | Cambodian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,731 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $117,780 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $96,324 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,386 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,516 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $45,014 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,571 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $107,148 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $114,342 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,892 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.8% | Tragic 27.2% |
Cambodian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 51.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 45.5%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.5%).
Poverty Metric | Cambodian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.4% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Cambodian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 52.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Cambodian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Good 5.4% |
Cambodian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cambodian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.4% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 37.0% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 79.0% |
Cambodian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.6%), births to unmarried women (26.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 36.0%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Cambodian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 61.4% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.7% | Tragic 36.3% |
Cambodian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 38.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 35.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 25.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cambodian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Cambodian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 77.5%), master's degree (20.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 75.0%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 70.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Education Level Metric | Cambodian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.2% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.9% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.7% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 54.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 47.2% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Cambodian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 64.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 62.6%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.6%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.0%).
Disability Metric | Cambodian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.3% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |