Spaniard vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Spaniard
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Spaniards

Chickasaw

Fair
Fair
3,805
SOCIAL INDEX
35.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
210th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Spaniard Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,594,715 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Spaniard communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.839. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Spaniards within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.298% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Spaniards corresponds to an increase of 298.1 Chickasaw.
Spaniard Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Spaniard vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,889 compared to $82,193, a difference of 21.5%), median household income ($84,644 compared to $70,005, a difference of 20.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,366 compared to $77,929, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.78%), median female earnings ($38,656 compared to $34,414, a difference of 12.3%), and median earnings ($46,059 compared to $40,672, a difference of 13.2%).
Spaniard vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricSpaniardChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Fair
$43,028
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,617
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Average
$84,644
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Fair
$46,059
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,401
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,656
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,117
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,366
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$99,889
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,866
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
27.2%

Spaniard vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 20.6%), single female poverty (22.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.9%).
Spaniard vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricSpaniardChickasaw
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Fair
9.4%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Poor
11.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Poor
13.9%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
18.1%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
17.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
10.9%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
11.9%
Tragic
13.1%

Spaniard vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Spaniard vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSpaniardChickasaw
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.6%
Good
5.4%

Spaniard vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.4% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.92%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Spaniard vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSpaniardChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.4%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.4%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.5%
Tragic
79.0%

Spaniard vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.79%), and family households (65.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Spaniard vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSpaniardChickasaw
Family Households
Exceptional
65.1%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Average
46.8%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.6%
Tragic
36.3%

Spaniard vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.52%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.30%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.52%).
Spaniard vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSpaniardChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.8%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.4%

Spaniard vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 31.5%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.25%).
Spaniard vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricSpaniardChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Good
95.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Average
93.7%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.4%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.3%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
59.0%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.2%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.6%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Spaniard vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Spaniard and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 31.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 31.4%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.5%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.6%).
Spaniard vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricSpaniardChickasaw
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.6%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%