Yakama vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,190,592 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.851. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to an increase of 50.7 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $44,763, a difference of 21.3%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and per capita income ($33,009 compared to $36,475, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($83,932 compared to $85,356, a difference of 1.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,226 compared to $77,929, a difference of 2.2%), and median household income ($72,225 compared to $70,005, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 63.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 57.4%), and married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (15.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 150.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 86.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 52.1%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (44.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households (69.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 74.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 39.6%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 109.7%), bachelor's degree (24.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 24.2%), and master's degree (9.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 74.2%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 29.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and disability age 65 to 74 (29.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 1.9%).