Paiute vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Paiute
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Paiute
Chickasaw
1,041
SOCIAL INDEX
8.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
325th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Paiute Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,860,711 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Paiute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.991. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Paiute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.397% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Paiute corresponds to an increase of 397.4 Chickasaw.
Paiute vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Paiute and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,743 compared to $44,763, a difference of 15.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,984 compared to $77,929, a difference of 6.5%), and wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,762 compared to $53,732, a difference of 0.060%), median family income ($85,414 compared to $85,356, a difference of 0.070%), and median male earnings ($47,991 compared to $47,832, a difference of 0.33%).
Income Metric | Paiute | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,066 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,414 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,959 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,508 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,991 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,056 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,743 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,984 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,629 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,762 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.5% | Tragic 27.2% |
Paiute vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Paiute and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 30.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (35.1% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 2.1%), single female poverty (25.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 5.1%).
Poverty Metric | Paiute | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.3% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.8% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.4% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 22.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.5% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 35.1% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.9% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 13.1% |
Paiute vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Paiute and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (7.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 83.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (17.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 57.3%), and male unemployment (7.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Paiute | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 7.7% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.7% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.9% | Good 5.4% |
Paiute vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Paiute and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (78.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (80.6% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Paiute | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.7% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 78.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 76.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
Paiute vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Paiute and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.8%), births to unmarried women (42.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.58%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Paiute | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Fair 64.0% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.7% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.5% | Tragic 36.3% |
Paiute vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Paiute and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 50.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Paiute | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.8% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.8% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Paiute vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Paiute and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 39.8%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and bachelor's degree (28.1% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.47%).
Education Level Metric | Paiute | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.0% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.7% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.4% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.6% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.9% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.1% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Paiute vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Paiute and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (3.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 124.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 0.65%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
Disability Metric | Paiute | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 3.9% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Poor 5.7% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.9% |