Chippewa vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,492,336 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.752. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 73.1 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 8.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $44,763, a difference of 5.0%), and median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $47,832, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $53,732, a difference of 0.21%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $36,475, a difference of 0.43%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $70,005, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.30%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 48.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 37.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 17.5%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.40%), family households (62.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (40.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 5.5%), college, 1 year or more (55.7% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.4%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.060%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.0%).