Ugandan vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ugandan
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ugandans
Chickasaw
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Ugandan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,688,684 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to an increase of 12.5 Chickasaw.
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,472 compared to $82,193, a difference of 25.9%), median household income ($87,557 compared to $70,005, a difference of 25.1%), and median family income ($106,541 compared to $85,356, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 12.9%), householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $44,763, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,177 compared to $53,732, a difference of 13.9%).
Income Metric | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,047 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,541 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,557 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,854 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,290 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,889 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,923 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,667 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,472 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,177 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.1% | Tragic 27.2% |
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 32.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 27.3%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.1%), receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.0%).
Poverty Metric | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Fair 9.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Poor 14.0% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.1% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.4% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Poor 17.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Good 20.8% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.8% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 11.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 39.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.8% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.4% |
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.4% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.6% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 20.6%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (61.7% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 61.7% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.8% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.2% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.1% | Tragic 36.3% |
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 45.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.5% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 52.2%), master's degree (17.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 50.0%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.40%).
Education Level Metric | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Average 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Average 97.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Good 97.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Good 96.2% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Good 95.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Good 95.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.0% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.2% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 53.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.81%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.1%).
Disability Metric | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |