African vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,793,499 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.613. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Africans corresponds to an increase of 7.2 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 18.4%), median female earnings ($36,530 compared to $34,414, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,838 compared to $44,763, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,711 compared to $53,732, a difference of 0.040%), median male earnings ($47,994 compared to $47,832, a difference of 0.34%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,986 compared to $77,929, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.22%), married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and single mother poverty (33.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.1%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.1%), family households (62.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 56.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.7%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.49%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between African and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.0%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.1%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.80%), disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.9%).