Immigrants from South America vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from South America
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from South America
Chickasaw
4,371
SOCIAL INDEX
41.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
200th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from South America Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,092,838 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from South America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South America corresponds to an increase of 1.2 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from South America vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($85,611 compared to $70,005, a difference of 22.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,268 compared to $44,763, a difference of 21.2%), and per capita income ($44,068 compared to $36,475, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,151 compared to $53,732, a difference of 10.1%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and median male earnings ($53,962 compared to $47,832, a difference of 12.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from South America | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,068 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,414 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Average $85,611 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,548 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,962 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,643 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,268 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $94,042 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $99,126 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,151 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.6% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from South America vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 36.7%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 35.1%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.85%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and family poverty (9.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 14.7%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from South America | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Fair 12.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Poor 9.5% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Fair 11.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.9% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.3% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 17.1% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Excellent 15.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.5% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.7% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from South America vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from South America | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from South America vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from South America | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.3% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from South America vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.8%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and currently married (45.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from South America | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.6% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.27 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.7% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 32.0% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from South America vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 43.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 43.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 17.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 32.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from South America | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.8% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.2% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from South America vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.7%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 37.8%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.24%), ged/equivalency (84.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.83%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from South America | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.1% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.6% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.8% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.7% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.6% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from South America vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 68.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 62.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.6%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.8%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from South America | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.7% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |