Immigrants from Indonesia vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,376,831 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Indonesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Indonesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Indonesia corresponds to a decrease of 10.8 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($97,297 compared to $70,005, a difference of 39.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,627 compared to $77,929, a difference of 38.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,519 compared to $82,193, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income under 25 years ($55,521 compared to $44,763, a difference of 24.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,694 compared to $53,732, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 52.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 43.7%), and single male poverty (11.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.93%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 34.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.80%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.98%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 31.0%), divorced or separated (10.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 30.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.97%), currently married (47.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (66.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 59.1%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 56.8%), and master's degree (17.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.030%), 10th grade (93.4% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 66.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 61.3%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.1%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.9%).