Immigrants from Chile vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Chickasaw
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,221,889 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.691. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.133% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 2,132.9 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Chile vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $36,475, a difference of 26.7%), median household income ($88,388 compared to $70,005, a difference of 26.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $82,193, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $53,732, a difference of 16.1%), and median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $47,832, a difference of 17.0%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,213 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,655 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $88,388 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,697 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $55,954 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,353 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,440 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,159 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,412 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,354 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 35.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 32.7%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.9%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Average 12.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Average 8.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.4% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.7% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.1% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Average 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.5%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.4%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.24%), currently married (46.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Good 64.6% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.7% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.5% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 31.2% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.1% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.2% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.1% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 56.6%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 46.8%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (88.9% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.53%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 59.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 59.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.8%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |