Immigrants from Venezuela vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,202,362 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Venezuela communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.112. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Venezuela within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Venezuela corresponds to an increase of 5.4 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($81,506 compared to $70,005, a difference of 16.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($95,342 compared to $82,193, a difference of 16.0%), and per capita income ($41,727 compared to $36,475, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income over 65 years ($57,371 compared to $53,732, a difference of 6.8%), and median female earnings ($37,003 compared to $34,414, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 40.4%), single male poverty (12.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 35.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.66%), receiving food stamps (12.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 26.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 13.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.4% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.3%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and divorced or separated (13.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.80%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (66.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 42.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.31%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 44.1%), master's degree (15.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 37.4%), and bachelor's degree (40.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.8% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.31%), high school diploma (88.8% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Venezuela and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 73.7%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 72.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.4%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 26.6%).