French American Indian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,144,105 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.424. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.413% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 412.9 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,244 compared to $36,475, a difference of 10.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,899 compared to $77,929, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $44,763, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,699 compared to $53,732, a difference of 1.8%), median male earnings ($50,611 compared to $47,832, a difference of 5.8%), and median earnings ($43,333 compared to $40,672, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 10.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and single male poverty (15.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.2%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 7.5%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.24%), births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 0.85%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.7%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and master's degree (12.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (88.7% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and 10th grade (93.7% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.2%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 28.7%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 5.3%).