Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Mexican American Indian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Mexican American Indians
Chickasaw
1,555
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
301st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Mexican American Indian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,463,080 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.849. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.096% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 96.2 Chickasaw.
Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $44,763, a difference of 15.7%), median household income ($78,166 compared to $70,005, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,811 compared to $82,193, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $47,832, a difference of 0.33%), per capita income ($37,407 compared to $36,475, a difference of 2.6%), and median earnings ($41,719 compared to $40,672, a difference of 2.6%).
Income Metric | Mexican American Indian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,407 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,918 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $78,166 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,719 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,990 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,629 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,783 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $85,066 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,811 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,089 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 24.9%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.11%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.72%).
Poverty Metric | Mexican American Indian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.9% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.4% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Mexican American Indian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.3% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.4% |
Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Mexican American Indian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Fair 64.9% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.2% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Fair 36.0% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 18.1%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.19, a difference of 7.5%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Mexican American Indian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.0% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.7% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.43 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.5% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.0% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 35.7% | Tragic 36.3% |
Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 15.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 0.48%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 4.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Mexican American Indian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.7% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.3% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 88.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and high school diploma (83.0% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.51%), associate's degree (38.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Mexican American Indian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 92.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 89.0% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.5% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 85.7% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 83.0% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 79.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 58.1% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.9% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Mexican American Indian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.3%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 38.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.9%).
Disability Metric | Mexican American Indian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Poor 12.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.6% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.0% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Fair 3.0% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |