Lumbee vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,230,616 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.995. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.374% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to an increase of 373.7 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($40,550 compared to $53,732, a difference of 32.5%), householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $44,763, a difference of 29.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $77,929, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $34,414, a difference of 5.9%), median earnings ($36,876 compared to $40,672, a difference of 10.3%), and median male earnings ($41,715 compared to $47,832, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 75.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (18.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 69.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 69.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 25.6%), single female poverty (33.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 25.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 83.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 66.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 23.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 32.8%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.2%), and currently married (39.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.97%), family households (63.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 31.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.6%), professional degree (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 36.5%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 29.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.6%), and ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (15.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.74%), disability (15.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.4%).