Panamanian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,918,838 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Panamanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Panamanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Panamanians corresponds to an increase of 14.9 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($82,272 compared to $70,005, a difference of 17.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,066 compared to $82,193, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,193 compared to $77,929, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,266 compared to $53,732, a difference of 8.4%), median male earnings ($52,835 compared to $47,832, a difference of 10.5%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 26.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 24.4%), and single female poverty (21.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.9%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), family households (64.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 59.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.1%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.2%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.060%), high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 49.0%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 36.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.3%).