Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,580,844 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.233% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 233.0 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $36,475, a difference of 41.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $77,929, a difference of 37.2%), and median household income ($95,319 compared to $70,005, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.40%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $44,763, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $53,732, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 47.7%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 41.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.69%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 35.3%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 32.3%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.5%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 50.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 73.2%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 62.4%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.040%), 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 61.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 57.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 13.5%), cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.3%).