Immigrants from Armenia vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Armenia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Armenia

Chickasaw

Fair
Fair
3,337
SOCIAL INDEX
30.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
226th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Armenia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,846,406 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Armenia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.168. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Armenia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Armenia corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Armenia Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Immigrants from Armenia vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 31.1%), per capita income ($44,552 compared to $36,475, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,867 compared to $77,929, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,974 compared to $53,732, a difference of 0.45%), median male earnings ($51,793 compared to $47,832, a difference of 8.3%), and median earnings ($46,094 compared to $40,672, a difference of 13.3%).
Immigrants from Armenia vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ArmeniaChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,552
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,605
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,555
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Fair
$46,094
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,793
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,340
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,986
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$94,867
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,863
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,974
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.7%
Tragic
27.2%

Immigrants from Armenia vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 50.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 42.1%), and single female poverty (18.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.62%), female poverty (15.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and poverty (13.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 5.8%).
Immigrants from Armenia vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ArmeniaChickasaw
Poverty
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
15.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.5%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.2%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
13.1%

Immigrants from Armenia vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 39.7%), and unemployment (7.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.8%).
Immigrants from Armenia vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ArmeniaChickasaw
Unemployment
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
6.9%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
7.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.5%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Armenia vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 32.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Armenia vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ArmeniaChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.3%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.2%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.7%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Armenia vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 39.3%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 36.6%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple households (44.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.19, a difference of 5.0%).
Immigrants from Armenia vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ArmeniaChickasaw
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.6%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.3%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.35
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.1%
Tragic
36.3%

Immigrants from Armenia vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 34.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.9%).
Immigrants from Armenia vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ArmeniaChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.6%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Armenia vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 97.5%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 34.9%), and bachelor's degree (39.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.88%), nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Armenia vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ArmeniaChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
92.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.9%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.8%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.2%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.7%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.0%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.4%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.4%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Good
4.5%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Armenia vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Armenia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.76% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 130.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 79.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (54.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 8.0%).
Immigrants from Armenia vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ArmeniaChickasaw
Disability
Average
11.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.76%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
54.3%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
2.9%