Argentinean vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,827,430 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.733. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 48.0 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $36,475, a difference of 36.7%), median household income ($93,960 compared to $70,005, a difference of 34.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $82,193, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.65%), householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $44,763, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $53,732, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 42.1%), single female poverty (19.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 37.5%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.3%), births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 21.0%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.89%), currently married (47.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 42.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 76.3%), master's degree (18.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 59.2%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.7% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 71.7%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 63.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.8%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.1%).