Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hawaiian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hawaiians
Chickasaw
3,537
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
218th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Hawaiian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,587,802 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 0.8 Chickasaw.
Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($84,729 compared to $70,005, a difference of 21.0%), householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $53,732, a difference of 20.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $82,193, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $47,832, a difference of 5.6%), median earnings ($43,673 compared to $40,672, a difference of 7.4%), and per capita income ($39,403 compared to $36,475, a difference of 8.0%).
Income Metric | Hawaiian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,403 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Poor $98,869 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,729 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,673 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,488 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,497 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $53,078 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $90,722 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,778 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,920 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 24.9% | Tragic 27.2% |
Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 30.7%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 29.4%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.8%).
Poverty Metric | Hawaiian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Fair 12.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Average 9.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Fair 13.6% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.7% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Poor 14.1% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Average 17.4% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.4% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Fair 21.2% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.2% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Hawaiian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.8% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.5% | Good 5.4% |
Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hawaiian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.4% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.0% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.2% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.8%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.19, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), family households with children (28.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Hawaiian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.4% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.7% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.41 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.2% | Tragic 36.3% |
Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.25%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 2.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hawaiian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.4% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 24.3% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.5%), associate's degree (40.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and college, 1 year or more (55.6% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.070%), high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
Education Level Metric | Hawaiian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.8% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.8% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 85.0% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.9% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.8%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 39.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.6%).
Disability Metric | Hawaiian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.5% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.2% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |