Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Germany
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Germany

Chickasaw

Good
Fair
6,453
SOCIAL INDEX
62.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
153rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Germany Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,311,124 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Germany communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.704. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Germany within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.521% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Germany corresponds to an increase of 3,521.0 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Germany Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Germany and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,282 compared to $82,193, a difference of 25.7%), per capita income ($45,751 compared to $36,475, a difference of 25.4%), and median household income ($86,764 compared to $70,005, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,190 compared to $44,763, a difference of 14.4%), and median female earnings ($39,603 compared to $34,414, a difference of 15.1%).
Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricImmigrants from GermanyChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,751
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,507
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Good
$86,764
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,566
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,542
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,603
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,190
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,913
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,282
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,544
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.5%
Tragic
27.2%

Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Germany and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 27.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 25.4%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 12.0%).
Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from GermanyChickasaw
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Good
10.9%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Good
13.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.3%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.4%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.8%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.2%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.5%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.1%

Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Germany and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.74%).
Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from GermanyChickasaw
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.5%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Germany and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from GermanyChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.9%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.8%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.2%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Germany and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.2%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from GermanyChickasaw
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.8%
Tragic
36.3%

Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Germany and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.96%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.6%).
Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from GermanyChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Germany and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 44.3%), master's degree (15.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 38.2%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from GermanyChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.7%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.5%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.3%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.1%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.6%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.8%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Germany and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 39.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.5%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.9%).
Immigrants from Germany vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from GermanyChickasaw
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.7%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.9%