Ethiopian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,457,185 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 4.1 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,640 compared to $70,005, a difference of 28.1%), per capita income ($46,569 compared to $36,475, a difference of 27.7%), and median family income ($108,251 compared to $85,356, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,243 compared to $47,832, a difference of 17.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $44,763, a difference of 20.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $53,732, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 46.2%), single father poverty (13.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 39.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 32.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (82.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 21.6%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 18.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 33.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 24.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 59.3%), master's degree (18.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 57.3%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.17%), high school diploma (89.0% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 67.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 61.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.2%).