Immigrants from Norway vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Chickasaw
7,420
SOCIAL INDEX
71.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
117th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Norway Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,805,100 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.310% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 310.3 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Norway vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,217 compared to $36,475, a difference of 43.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,629 compared to $77,929, a difference of 36.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,669 compared to $82,193, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.51%), householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $44,763, a difference of 13.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,118 compared to $53,732, a difference of 23.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Norway | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,217 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,847 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,846 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,758 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,628 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,837 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,984 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $106,629 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,669 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,118 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Norway vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 34.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 34.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and single father poverty (16.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 13.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Norway | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Excellent 12.8% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.4% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.3% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Good 20.8% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.3% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Norway vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.070%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.61%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Norway | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.8% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Excellent 7.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Norway vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Norway | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.6% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.2% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.9% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Norway vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 35.7%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (47.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Norway | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.5% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.2% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.9% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Norway vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 45.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Norway | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 19.0% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Norway vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 78.8%), master's degree (18.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 64.8%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Norway | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.2% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.5% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.2% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.7% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.5% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Norway vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 51.9%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 49.4%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Norway | Chickasaw |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Average 11.3% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.9% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |