Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,627,205 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Sri Lanka communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.324. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sri Lanka within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.210% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sri Lanka corresponds to an increase of 209.8 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,094 compared to $82,193, a difference of 44.9%), median household income ($99,943 compared to $70,005, a difference of 42.8%), and median family income ($120,263 compared to $85,356, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.080%), householder income under 25 years ($54,512 compared to $44,763, a difference of 21.8%), and median female earnings ($44,161 compared to $34,414, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 51.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 44.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 30.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 38.2%), births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 33.6%), and divorced or separated (10.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.78%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (65.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 41.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 85.1%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 83.5%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 74.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.14%), 9th grade (95.1% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 70.3%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 69.1%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.8%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.4%).