Ghanaian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ghanaians
Chickasaw
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Ghanaian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,344,466 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.540. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to a decrease of 12.2 Chickasaw.
Ghanaian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 21.6%), median household income ($83,582 compared to $70,005, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,277 compared to $82,193, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,810 compared to $47,832, a difference of 10.4%), householder income over 65 years ($60,043 compared to $53,732, a difference of 11.7%), and median earnings ($46,440 compared to $40,672, a difference of 14.2%).
Income Metric | Ghanaian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,164 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Poor $98,877 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,582 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,440 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,810 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,429 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,594 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $90,137 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $97,277 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $60,043 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 27.2% |
Ghanaian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 23.1%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 21.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 4.9%).
Poverty Metric | Ghanaian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.4% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.4% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.1% |
Ghanaian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Ghanaian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.4% |
Ghanaian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ghanaian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Ghanaian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.7%), and single mother households (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Ghanaian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.2% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.9% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.3% | Tragic 36.3% |
Ghanaian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 109.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 41.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 10.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 35.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ghanaian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 48.0% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Ghanaian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 51.0%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.0%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.41%), ged/equivalency (84.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and high school diploma (87.7% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.83%).
Education Level Metric | Ghanaian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.8% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.5% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.7% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 63.9% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.0% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.3% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Ghanaian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 75.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 44.1%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.4%).
Disability Metric | Ghanaian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.5% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |