Menominee vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,666,423 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Menominee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Menominee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.363% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Menominee corresponds to an increase of 363.3 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Menominee and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 19.6%), median male earnings ($42,581 compared to $47,832, a difference of 12.3%), and median earnings ($37,884 compared to $40,672, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,894 compared to $34,414, a difference of 1.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,358 compared to $77,929, a difference of 1.8%), and median household income ($68,423 compared to $70,005, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Menominee and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 31.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (25.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 27.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (23.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.6%), single female poverty (27.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Menominee and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (10.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 120.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 67.2%), and female unemployment (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Menominee and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.7% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Menominee and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 53.2%), births to unmarried women (51.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 40.8%), and single mother households (9.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (66.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.30 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 49.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 49.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Menominee and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 14.5%), master's degree (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Menominee and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 32.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.0%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.51%), male disability (15.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.4%).