Immigrants from Kuwait vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Kuwait
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Kuwait

Chickasaw

Excellent
Fair
8,779
SOCIAL INDEX
85.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
49th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Kuwait Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,925,181 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Kuwait communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kuwait within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.081% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kuwait corresponds to an increase of 80.5 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Kuwait Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Immigrants from Kuwait vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,285 compared to $82,193, a difference of 29.3%), median family income ($109,731 compared to $85,356, a difference of 28.6%), and per capita income ($46,543 compared to $36,475, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($48,126 compared to $44,763, a difference of 7.5%), and median female earnings ($41,055 compared to $34,414, a difference of 19.3%).
Immigrants from Kuwait vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricImmigrants from KuwaitChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,543
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$109,731
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,263
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,861
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,562
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,055
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,126
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,122
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,285
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,433
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.6%
Tragic
27.2%

Immigrants from Kuwait vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 36.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 32.9%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.060%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 6.3%).
Immigrants from Kuwait vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from KuwaitChickasaw
Poverty
Fair
12.7%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Good
8.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.0%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.8%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.3%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Excellent
16.0%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.1%

Immigrants from Kuwait vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Kuwait vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from KuwaitChickasaw
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Kuwait vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 3.8%).
Immigrants from Kuwait vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from KuwaitChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.5%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.9%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Kuwait vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.1%), births to unmarried women (28.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 26.2%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.090%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and currently married (46.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Kuwait vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from KuwaitChickasaw
Family Households
Tragic
62.4%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Fair
46.1%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.8%
Tragic
36.3%

Immigrants from Kuwait vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.4%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.1%).
Immigrants from Kuwait vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from KuwaitChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.8%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Kuwait vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 70.8%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 69.3%), and master's degree (18.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.26%).
Immigrants from Kuwait vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from KuwaitChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.5%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.7%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
65.0%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.4%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.6%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Kuwait vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kuwait and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 62.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 61.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 57.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.7%).
Immigrants from Kuwait vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from KuwaitChickasaw
Disability
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.4%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%