Cajun vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,670,942 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Cajun communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.799. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cajuns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.643% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cajuns corresponds to an increase of 643.4 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (33.9% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 24.7%), median male earnings ($52,325 compared to $47,832, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,393 compared to $77,929, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($70,605 compared to $70,005, a difference of 0.86%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,015 compared to $82,193, a difference of 1.0%), and median female earnings ($34,034 compared to $34,414, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (23.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 21.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 20.2%), and single mother poverty (40.3% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 3.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 70.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 12.9%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.44%), family households (64.8% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and married-couple households (46.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.64%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in college, under 1 year (57.3% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 5.4%), college, 1 year or more (51.2% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 3rd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cajun and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 1.1%), female disability (14.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.9%).