Iroquois vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,299,558 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.276% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 276.0 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 8.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $77,929, a difference of 7.4%), and per capita income ($39,104 compared to $36,475, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $53,732, a difference of 0.010%), median male earnings ($49,374 compared to $47,832, a difference of 3.2%), and median earnings ($42,430 compared to $40,672, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 20.4%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.26%), child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and poverty (14.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 10.4%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.95%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (62.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 39.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.9%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and associate's degree (42.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.040%), 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 21.9%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.68%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 5.7%).