Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Chickasaw
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Micronesia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,800,772 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 77.4 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $53,732, a difference of 13.5%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $44,763, a difference of 13.2%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($41,133 compared to $40,672, a difference of 1.1%), median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $47,832, a difference of 1.4%), and per capita income ($37,464 compared to $36,475, a difference of 2.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,464 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,345 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,574 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,133 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,177 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,477 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,691 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,544 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,864 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,000 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.4% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 20.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 18.5%), and single female poverty (23.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.32%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.0% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.73%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Average 8.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.9% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.8% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.1% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.1%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.26%), currently married (45.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (44.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Average 64.2% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.6% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 32.9% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.1% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 23.4%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.5% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.8% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.2% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 73.1%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 34.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.1% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.9% |