Costa Rican vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,685,145 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 68.6 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,779 compared to $82,193, a difference of 25.1%), median household income ($87,262 compared to $70,005, a difference of 24.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,565 compared to $77,929, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 7.4%), median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $47,832, a difference of 13.5%), and median earnings ($46,645 compared to $40,672, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 30.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 29.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 18.0%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 33.0%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 31.0%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.050%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and 11th grade (91.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 50.1%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.9%).