Nigerian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Nigerian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Nigerians

Chickasaw

Poor
Fair
1,996
SOCIAL INDEX
17.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
277th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Nigerian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,582,880 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Nigerian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.109. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nigerians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nigerians corresponds to an increase of 4.3 Chickasaw.
Nigerian Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Nigerian vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 18.3%), median household income ($81,725 compared to $70,005, a difference of 16.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($95,492 compared to $82,193, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($52,039 compared to $47,832, a difference of 8.8%), householder income over 65 years ($58,992 compared to $53,732, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,416 compared to $44,763, a difference of 10.4%).
Nigerian vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricNigerianChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,026
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,522
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Poor
$81,725
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,532
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$52,039
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,641
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,416
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$87,730
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$95,492
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$58,992
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
27.2%

Nigerian vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 26.2%), single female poverty (21.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 22.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.5%).
Nigerian vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricNigerianChickasaw
Poverty
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Fair
21.4%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.3%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.8%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.1%

Nigerian vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 31.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Nigerian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNigerianChickasaw
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.4%

Nigerian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%).
Nigerian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNigerianChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.1%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.7%
Tragic
79.0%

Nigerian vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.73%), family households (63.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.85%), and births to unmarried women (35.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Nigerian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNigerianChickasaw
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.2%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Average
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.4%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
35.3%
Tragic
36.3%

Nigerian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 53.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 19.4%).
Nigerian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNigerianChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.0%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
7.4%

Nigerian vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 38.4%), master's degree (14.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 30.4%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (88.2% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and 11th grade (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.58%).
Nigerian vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricNigerianChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.5%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.1%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.2%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Average
14.9%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Nigerian vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nigerian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 69.5%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 41.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.1%).
Nigerian vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricNigerianChickasaw
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Excellent
12.0%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.7%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%