Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Potawatomi
Chickasaw
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Potawatomi Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,279,543 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to an increase of 55.5 Chickasaw.
Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,774 compared to $77,929, a difference of 4.9%), per capita income ($38,046 compared to $36,475, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,462 compared to $44,763, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,212 compared to $53,732, a difference of 0.89%), median female earnings ($34,739 compared to $34,414, a difference of 0.95%), and median earnings ($41,288 compared to $40,672, a difference of 1.5%).
Income Metric | Potawatomi | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,046 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,265 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,576 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,288 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,768 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,739 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $46,462 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $81,774 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $84,613 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,212 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 5.9%), receiving food stamps (12.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.32%), single mother poverty (34.1% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 0.87%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Poverty Metric | Potawatomi | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.7% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Poor 12.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Potawatomi | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.4% |
Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.2% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Potawatomi | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.8% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.2% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.0% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.2% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.7% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.2%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 0.14%), currently married (46.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.45%).
Family Structure Metric | Potawatomi | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.7% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.2% | Tragic 36.3% |
Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Potawatomi | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.0% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 5.9%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.050%).
Education Level Metric | Potawatomi | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.0% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.8% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.6% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Potawatomi vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 27.4%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.6%).
Disability Metric | Potawatomi | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |