Nepalese vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Nepalese
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Nepalese
Chickasaw
1,939
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
281st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Nepalese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,631,199 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Nepalese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nepalese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nepalese corresponds to an increase of 13.5 Chickasaw.
Nepalese vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 22.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,472 compared to $44,763, a difference of 21.7%), and median household income ($82,410 compared to $70,005, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,458 compared to $47,832, a difference of 3.4%), per capita income ($38,442 compared to $36,475, a difference of 5.4%), and median earnings ($43,860 compared to $40,672, a difference of 7.8%).
Income Metric | Nepalese | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,442 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $94,153 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,410 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,860 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,458 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,603 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,472 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,498 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,355 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,761 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 27.2% |
Nepalese vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 40.8%), single father poverty (14.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 31.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.1%), female poverty (15.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and poverty (14.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 4.6%).
Poverty Metric | Nepalese | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.4% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.2% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.3% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.3% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.5% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Nepalese vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 37.7%), male unemployment (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Nepalese | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.4% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 5.9% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.4% |
Nepalese vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Nepalese | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.8% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.5% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.4% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
Nepalese vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 13.9%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and births to unmarried women (33.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.75%), currently married (44.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and family households (67.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Nepalese | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.2% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 30.5% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.42 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.5% | Tragic 36.3% |
Nepalese vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.39%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Nepalese | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.4% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 24.9% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Nepalese vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 124.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.4%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (39.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 1.1%), bachelor's degree (29.9% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and nursery school (96.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Education Level Metric | Nepalese | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 92.8% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.7% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.5% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.1% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.3% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.2% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.9% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.9% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Nepalese vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nepalese and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 78.8%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.5%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 2.7%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Disability Metric | Nepalese | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.97% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 52.6% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.9% |