Paraguayan vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Paraguayan
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Paraguayans
Chickasaw
7,568
SOCIAL INDEX
73.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
112th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Paraguayan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,061,156 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Paraguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Paraguayans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Paraguayans corresponds to a decrease of 17.6 Chickasaw.
Paraguayan vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,385 compared to $36,475, a difference of 38.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,615 compared to $77,929, a difference of 36.8%), and median household income ($95,737 compared to $70,005, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,443 compared to $53,732, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,614 compared to $44,763, a difference of 24.2%).
Income Metric | Paraguayan | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,385 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,016 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,737 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,068 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,975 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,173 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,614 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $106,615 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $109,447 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,443 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.8% | Tragic 27.2% |
Paraguayan vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 45.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 42.0%), and single male poverty (11.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.5%).
Poverty Metric | Paraguayan | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.0% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.2% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.4% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Paraguayan vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 28.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.3%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Paraguayan | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.7% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.4% |
Paraguayan vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Paraguayan | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.5% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.6% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.8% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
Paraguayan vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.1%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 23.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.50%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.51%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Paraguayan | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.2% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.7% | Tragic 36.3% |
Paraguayan vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 82.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 50.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 34.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Paraguayan | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 85.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.3% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.6% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Paraguayan vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 74.4%), master's degree (18.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 64.7%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.7% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.39%), 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.49%).
Education Level Metric | Paraguayan | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Good 92.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.5% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.5% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.9% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Paraguayan vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 68.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 63.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age over 75 (45.0% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 13.8%).
Disability Metric | Paraguayan | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.0% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.5% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.0% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |