Okinawan vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Okinawan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Okinawans

Chickasaw

Excellent
Fair
8,907
SOCIAL INDEX
86.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
39th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Okinawan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,419,535 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Okinawan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Okinawans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.100% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Okinawans corresponds to an increase of 100.4 Chickasaw.
Okinawan Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Okinawan vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,349 compared to $77,929, a difference of 53.1%), per capita income ($55,817 compared to $36,475, a difference of 53.0%), and median household income ($106,624 compared to $70,005, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,701 compared to $44,763, a difference of 22.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,846 compared to $53,732, a difference of 31.9%).
Okinawan vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricOkinawanChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$55,817
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$129,979
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$106,624
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$57,550
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$67,232
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,905
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,701
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$119,349
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$124,796
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$70,846
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
27.2%

Okinawan vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 62.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 50.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 17.5%).
Okinawan vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricOkinawanChickasaw
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.8%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.6%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.9%
Tragic
13.1%

Okinawan vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 53.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%).
Okinawan vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricOkinawanChickasaw
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.4%

Okinawan vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.1%).
Okinawan vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricOkinawanChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.6%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.8%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.7%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.6%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
79.0%

Okinawan vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.5%), single mother households (5.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 40.5%), and divorced or separated (10.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.2%), currently married (47.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (62.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Okinawan vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricOkinawanChickasaw
Family Households
Tragic
62.5%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Poor
27.2%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.4%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.9%
Tragic
36.3%

Okinawan vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 78.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 34.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 27.3%).
Okinawan vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricOkinawanChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.1%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
7.4%

Okinawan vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 117.7%), doctorate degree (3.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 117.3%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 98.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.10%), 4th grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.18%).
Okinawan vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricOkinawanChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.4%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.9%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
73.7%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
69.0%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
57.7%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
50.5%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
22.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Okinawan vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Okinawan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 79.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 72.1%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 71.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age over 75 (44.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.1%).
Okinawan vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricOkinawanChickasaw
Disability
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.9%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%