Arab vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,958,324 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.236. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,566 compared to $82,193, a difference of 27.2%), median household income ($88,398 compared to $70,005, a difference of 26.3%), and median family income ($106,952 compared to $85,356, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,219 compared to $44,763, a difference of 14.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,266 compared to $53,732, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 28.4%), single female poverty (20.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 26.8%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.90%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.1%), births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.54%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 33.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 50.1%), master's degree (16.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 46.2%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 9th grade (95.1% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 51.1%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 50.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.5%).