German vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
German
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Germans
Chickasaw
6,819
SOCIAL INDEX
65.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
140th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in German Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,720,200 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Germans corresponds to an increase of 8.0 Chickasaw.
German vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between German and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,224 compared to $82,193, a difference of 21.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,531 compared to $77,929, a difference of 20.0%), and median family income ($102,254 compared to $85,356, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 7.4%), median female earnings ($37,986 compared to $34,414, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,730 compared to $53,732, a difference of 11.2%).
Income Metric | German | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Fair $43,067 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Average $102,254 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,358 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,935 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $54,974 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,986 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,804 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,531 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $100,224 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $59,730 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.2% | Tragic 27.2% |
German vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.5%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 41.6%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 7.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 14.8%).
Poverty Metric | German | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.5% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.0% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.0% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
German vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 39.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.4%).
Unemployment Metric | German | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.4% |
German vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | German | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.4% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 44.2% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.6% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.1% | Tragic 79.0% |
German vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.060%), average family size (3.09 compared to 3.19, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.2%).
Family Structure Metric | German | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.2% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.09 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.6% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.0% | Tragic 36.3% |
German vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.20%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | German | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.6% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.5% | Exceptional 7.4% |
German vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between German and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 25.0%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.7%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
Education Level Metric | German | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.7% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.9% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.5% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Poor 36.1% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
German vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between German and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 42.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 31.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.0%).
Disability Metric | German | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |