Blackfeet vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,715,712 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 24.4 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $44,763, a difference of 8.6%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,595 compared to $82,193, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,029 compared to $53,732, a difference of 0.55%), median male earnings ($48,402 compared to $47,832, a difference of 1.2%), and median earnings ($41,822 compared to $40,672, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 18.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 17.8%), and receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 6.9%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.8%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 19.3%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.8%), and associate's degree (40.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.050%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.6%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 21.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.3%).