Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Chickasaw
3,407
SOCIAL INDEX
31.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
221st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Nicaragua Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,411,943 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to an increase of 28.4 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $44,763, a difference of 19.0%), wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 18.2%), and median household income ($76,784 compared to $70,005, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,482 compared to $47,832, a difference of 0.74%), median earnings ($41,737 compared to $40,672, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,085 compared to $53,732, a difference of 3.2%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Nicaragua | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,065 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,267 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $76,784 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,737 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,482 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,023 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,266 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,914 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $89,108 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $52,085 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.0% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 51.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 48.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.63%), poverty (14.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and family poverty (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Nicaragua | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.9% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.9% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 17.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Nicaragua | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.4% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Nicaragua | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 6.7%), currently married (43.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.19, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.22%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Nicaragua | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.5% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.37 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.7% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.0% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Nicaragua | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Good 9.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.4% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 81.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Nicaragua | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 93.0% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 92.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 89.5% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.1% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 86.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 83.1% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 79.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.6% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 52.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 67.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 59.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 6.1%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.0%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Nicaragua | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.9% |