Immigrants from Argentina vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,410,147 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Argentina communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.644. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Argentina within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.583% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Argentina corresponds to an increase of 582.7 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,627 compared to $36,475, a difference of 36.1%), median household income ($92,417 compared to $70,005, a difference of 32.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,264 compared to $82,193, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($63,885 compared to $53,732, a difference of 18.9%), and median female earnings ($41,554 compared to $34,414, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 41.9%), single female poverty (19.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 38.0%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and receiving food stamps (11.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.0%), births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.70%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 42.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 75.1%), master's degree (18.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 57.3%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.7% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.37%), 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Argentina and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 72.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 62.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.5%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.2%).