Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yugoslavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yugoslavians

Chickasaw

Good
Fair
6,775
SOCIAL INDEX
65.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
143rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Yugoslavian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,413,304 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Yugoslavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yugoslavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.313% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yugoslavians corresponds to an increase of 313.0 Chickasaw.
Yugoslavian Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,558 compared to $82,193, a difference of 18.7%), median household income ($82,186 compared to $70,005, a difference of 17.4%), and per capita income ($42,792 compared to $36,475, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($58,243 compared to $53,732, a difference of 8.4%), and median female earnings ($38,573 compared to $34,414, a difference of 12.1%).
Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricYugoslavianChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Fair
$42,792
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,119
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,186
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,846
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,967
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,573
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,028
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,368
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$97,558
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,243
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
27.2%

Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 29.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 27.2%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.5%).
Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricYugoslavianChickasaw
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Good
10.8%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Good
13.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.6%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.2%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.8%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.2%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.1%

Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYugoslavianChickasaw
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.4%

Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.7%).
Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYugoslavianChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.8%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.0%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
79.0%

Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 17.7%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.73%), currently married (47.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.3%).
Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYugoslavianChickasaw
Family Households
Tragic
63.1%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.8%
Tragic
36.3%

Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.6%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.7%).
Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYugoslavianChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
7.4%

Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.9%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and bachelor's degree (37.1% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricYugoslavianChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.7%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.2%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.1%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%

Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 46.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.3%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.1%).
Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricYugoslavianChickasaw
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
2.9%