Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Yugoslavians
Chickasaw
6,775
SOCIAL INDEX
65.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
143rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Yugoslavian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,413,304 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Yugoslavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.623. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yugoslavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.313% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yugoslavians corresponds to an increase of 313.0 Chickasaw.
Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,558 compared to $82,193, a difference of 18.7%), median household income ($82,186 compared to $70,005, a difference of 17.4%), and per capita income ($42,792 compared to $36,475, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($58,243 compared to $53,732, a difference of 8.4%), and median female earnings ($38,573 compared to $34,414, a difference of 12.1%).
Income Metric | Yugoslavian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Fair $42,792 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,119 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,186 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,846 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,967 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,573 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,028 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,368 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $97,558 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,243 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 29.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 27.2%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.5%).
Poverty Metric | Yugoslavian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Good 10.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Average 17.2% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.8% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.2% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Fair 21.2% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.4% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Yugoslavian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.5% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Yugoslavian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.8% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.0% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 17.7%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.73%), currently married (47.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Yugoslavian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 63.1% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.2% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.2% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.8% | Tragic 36.3% |
Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.6%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Yugoslavian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.1% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.6% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.9%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 22.2%), and bachelor's degree (37.1% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
Education Level Metric | Yugoslavian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.2% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.2% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.1% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Yugoslavian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 46.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 37.3%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.1%).
Disability Metric | Yugoslavian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |