Tsimshian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 12,260,107 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.084% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 84.2 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $77,929, a difference of 25.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $44,763, a difference of 22.1%), and median household income ($83,346 compared to $70,005, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $47,832, a difference of 2.1%), median earnings ($43,695 compared to $40,672, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $53,732, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 71.1%), single father poverty (12.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 49.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.97%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 122.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 81.2%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.2%), births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 16.1%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.9%), currently married (47.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (67.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.93%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in college, 1 year or more (57.9% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 8.7%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and college, under 1 year (64.3% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (38.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.060%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 38.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), male disability (15.6% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.8%).