Turkish vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Turkish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Turks

Chickasaw

Exceptional
Fair
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Turkish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,260,648 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.522. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.129% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 129.2 Chickasaw.
Turkish Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Turkish vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $36,475, a difference of 43.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $82,193, a difference of 43.3%), and median family income ($121,202 compared to $85,356, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $44,763, a difference of 21.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $53,732, a difference of 26.6%).
Turkish vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricTurkishChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,391
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$121,202
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$99,389
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,919
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$64,253
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,695
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,266
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$110,318
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,814
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$68,037
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
27.2%

Turkish vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 49.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 49.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.20%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 20.3%).
Turkish vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricTurkishChickasaw
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.1%

Turkish vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 27.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%).
Turkish vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTurkishChickasaw
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
8.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.4%

Turkish vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.6%).
Turkish vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTurkishChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.9%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.7%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Tragic
79.0%

Turkish vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.2%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 32.2%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.73%), family households (63.6% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Turkish vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTurkishChickasaw
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
36.3%

Turkish vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 48.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.4%).
Turkish vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTurkishChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.3%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
7.4%

Turkish vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 84.6%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 76.6%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 74.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.020%), 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Turkish vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricTurkishChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.5%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.7%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
65.5%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
1.5%

Turkish vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 66.9%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 66.8%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.3%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.5%).
Turkish vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricTurkishChickasaw
Disability
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%