Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Haiti
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Haiti
Chickasaw
1,401
SOCIAL INDEX
11.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
310th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Haiti Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,856,545 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Haiti communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Haiti within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Haiti corresponds to an increase of 9.4 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 41.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,398 compared to $44,763, a difference of 12.6%), and median male earnings ($45,266 compared to $47,832, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,550 compared to $40,672, a difference of 0.30%), per capita income ($36,849 compared to $36,475, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,257 compared to $82,193, a difference of 1.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Haiti | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,849 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,018 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,599 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,550 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,266 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,203 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,398 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $79,391 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,257 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,219 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 41.9%), receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 39.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (16.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.7%), male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and poverty (15.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Haiti | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.7% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.3% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.9% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Poor 21.5% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Haiti | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.5% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.1% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Haiti | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.2% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.6% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.2%), currently married (41.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Haiti | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 40.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.39 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.0% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.9% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 95.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 65.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 9.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (46.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 46.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Haiti | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 46.5% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 77.4%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and college, under 1 year (56.9% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 0.31%), bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Haiti | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.2% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.4% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.9% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 72.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 50.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Haiti | Chickasaw |
Disability | Average 11.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Average 12.2% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.3% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.4% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |