Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Haiti
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Haiti

Chickasaw

Poor
Fair
1,401
SOCIAL INDEX
11.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
310th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Haiti Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,856,545 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Haiti communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.213. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Haiti within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Haiti corresponds to an increase of 9.4 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Haiti Integration in Chickasaw Communities

Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 41.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,398 compared to $44,763, a difference of 12.6%), and median male earnings ($45,266 compared to $47,832, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($40,550 compared to $40,672, a difference of 0.30%), per capita income ($36,849 compared to $36,475, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,257 compared to $82,193, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Income
Income MetricImmigrants from HaitiChickasaw
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,849
Tragic
$36,475
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,018
Tragic
$85,356
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,599
Tragic
$70,005
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,550
Tragic
$40,672
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,266
Tragic
$47,832
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,203
Tragic
$34,414
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,398
Tragic
$44,763
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$79,391
Tragic
$77,929
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,257
Tragic
$82,193
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,219
Tragic
$53,732
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
27.2%

Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 41.9%), receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 39.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (16.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.7%), male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and poverty (15.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from HaitiChickasaw
Poverty
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
14.7%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
24.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
21.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
19.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
16.3%
Single Females
Poor
21.5%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.2%
Tragic
19.0%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Tragic
34.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.7%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
13.1%

Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.2%).
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from HaitiChickasaw
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
6.5%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.1%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Poor
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.2% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from HaitiChickasaw
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
62.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.2%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.2%), currently married (41.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.0%).
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from HaitiChickasaw
Family Households
Exceptional
65.3%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.2%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.9%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.39
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.0%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.9%
Tragic
36.3%

Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 95.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 65.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 9.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (46.5% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 46.3%).
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from HaitiChickasaw
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
46.5%
Exceptional
59.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
7.4%

Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 77.4%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and college, under 1 year (56.9% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 0.31%), bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from HaitiChickasaw
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.7%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.4%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.9%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.4%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.9%
Tragic
60.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
53.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.3%
Tragic
38.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.6%
Tragic
30.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Haiti and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 72.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 50.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.6%).
Immigrants from Haiti vs Chickasaw Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from HaitiChickasaw
Disability
Average
11.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
15.1%
Females
Average
12.2%
Tragic
15.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.3%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.4%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.3%
Tragic
51.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
4.5%
Cognitive
Fair
17.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
8.0%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%