Immigrants from Mexico vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,491,314 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.243. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to an increase of 2.1 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $44,763, a difference of 12.6%), per capita income ($33,931 compared to $36,475, a difference of 7.5%), and wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,809 compared to $77,929, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $53,732, a difference of 1.8%), and median family income ($83,639 compared to $85,356, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 28.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother poverty (34.0% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 27.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.9%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and family households with children (31.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.2%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 115.1%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.6%), and professional degree (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 39.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.1% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 0.19%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.3%).