Immigrants from Sudan vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sudan
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Sudan
Chickasaw
4,416
SOCIAL INDEX
41.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
199th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Sudan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,764,688 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Sudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sudan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sudan corresponds to an increase of 17.3 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Sudan vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,986 compared to $36,475, a difference of 15.1%), wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and median family income ($97,737 compared to $85,356, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($46,791 compared to $44,763, a difference of 4.5%), median male earnings ($51,489 compared to $47,832, a difference of 7.6%), and median earnings ($44,767 compared to $40,672, a difference of 10.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Sudan | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,986 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $97,737 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $79,103 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,767 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,489 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,511 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $46,791 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $86,109 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,781 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,248 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.6% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Sudan vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 28.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.7%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Sudan | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Average 12.7% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.6% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.1% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Sudan vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.86%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Sudan | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.5% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Sudan vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.0% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Sudan | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.7% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.4% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.0% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.8% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Sudan vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.9%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and married-couple households (41.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.86%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Sudan | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 60.2% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.3% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.22 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.5% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.2% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Sudan vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 34.8%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 26.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Sudan | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.8% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Sudan vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 45.5%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.9%), and master's degree (16.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.10%), high school diploma (88.9% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.8% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.55%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Sudan | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Poor 95.8% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.4% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.8% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 66.2% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.4% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Excellent 39.4% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Sudan vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 56.7%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 49.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.3%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Sudan | Chickasaw |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Fair 47.5% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |